AMERICA Magazine
A balanced Catholic weekly magazine published by the jesuits of the United States for an intelligent Catholic readership. Go online to subscribe.
Liturgy
This link will keep 'parishioners-at-large' in touch with current creative liturgy sources and resources that respect a variety of 'traditions' within the Church.
Voice of the Faithful
A 'movement' of lay Catholics 'inspired' by the abuse scandal calling for greater accountability of bishops to 'Catholics in the Pew.'
Survivos' Network for those Abused by Priests or Religious
A National Network of self-help support groups for people abused by clergy or religious.
Bishop Accountability
Vital information about the disclosure of sexual abuse and related issues affecting Catholics in the pew and the manner in which Bishops continue to exempt themselves from accountability
National Catholic Reporter
A national Catholic lay newspaper covering events not usually covered or presented with a clerical bias in the local diocesan press or but of concern and interest to Catholics.
COMMONWEAL Magazine
A 'lay' Catholic weekly publication with an accent on an intelligent analysis and commentary on curent issues, trends and concerns of interest to Catholics.
+ 5th Week in Ordinary Time
It still has meaning.
1 Kings 8:1-7, 9-13 Psalm 132:6-7, 8-10 Mark 6:53-56
The priests brought the ark of the covenant of the Lord to its place beneath the wings of the cherubim in the sanctuary, the holy of holies of the temple. There was nothing in the ark but the two stone tablets which Moses had put there at Horeb, when the Lord made a covenant with the children of Israel. [1 Kings 8:6, 8]
_
In recent years there has been much discussion in liturgical circles about the proper location of the tabernacle in the worship space. The directives implementing the Constitution on the Liturgy by the Second Vatican Council prescribed that the tabernacle be located in prominent location in the church or chapel, preferably in a chapel dedicated to the reservation of the Blessed Sacrament and appropriate for veneration. In any case, it was not to be located on the altar table used for the celebration of the Eucharist. As a result in many churches renovations, the tabernacle was moved to the ‘side altar’ previously used for the veneration of the Blessed Virgin or St. Joseph and in some churches, it was placed on the old altar previously used for Mass. In situations the old altar was replaced with a permanent pedestal on which the tabernacle was placed.
In liturgical matters, nothing is simple. Those of a more conservative disposition insisted that the location of the Tabernacle on the side altar reduced the status of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist thereby diminishing its meaning in the devotional life of the faithful. Others of a more liberal persuasion opined that in fact, the location in a separate chapel within the church assigned to the sacrament greater prominence thereby increasing the devotional aspect. Moreover, in as much as an emphasis of the ‘action’ of the Mass as the repetition of the “Lord’s Supper” was promoted by the Council, it seemed to liturgists that the location of the tabernacle in the main sanctuary behind the free standing Eucharist table would compete with the ‘action’ of the Mass as a sacred meal.
The most recent prescriptions in the United States provide that the tabernacle be located in the main sanctuary on suitably ornate pedestal. It is ironic that in the major basilicas including the basilica of St. Peter in Rome, the tabernacle is located on a side altar that is not very prominent.
Whatever the location, it should not be a bone of contention worthy of a liturgical battle. The public and private devotion to the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist is rooted in the long tradition of the Church and should not be disparaged. In the same way in which the tablets of stone on which the Ten Commandments was symbolic of God’s presence in the temple, so too, the reservation of the Eucharist Bread has been one of the longest-standing practices of the devotional life of Catholics. It is intended to extend the meaning and the effects of the Eucharistic celebration into the life of the faithful who continue to spend time in prayerful meditation on the mysteries of the life of Jesus not the least of which is his faithfulness unto death on the cross for the salvation of the world. The two aspects of Eucharist need not be in competition. The ‘Mass’ continues to be considered a “sacrificial” meal. But we need to be clear that its connection with the passion and death of Christ even as the lamb of God is not to suggest that his death was mandated to satisfy and angry God. That in my opinion is not an appropriate application of Old Testament sacrifices. No, Jesus sacrificial death was the completion of his entire sacrificial life of unqualified and indiscriminate love in the same way as the sacrificial love of partners in marriage offer their sacrificial love to one another or in the manner that Mother Teresa offered her live in sacrificial service to victims of poverty in the streets of Calctta. It is in this sense that devotion to the Eucharist in the tabernacle takes its extended meaning.
During the celebration of the Eucharist, we become what we eat. Through our devotion to the Eucharist reserved in the tabernacle, we are reminded that the Eucharistic presence in our mind, heart and soul extends into all the good works of our lives with the hope that we too will always think and act with the same sacrificial love as did Jesus in his earthly life.
Daily Scripture Archive»Prophet or Pest?
I think it’s fair to say that we all come in contact with ‘pesty people’ now and then. They’re not bad people mind you but they are amazingly adept at disturbing the peace at the most inopportune time—when is it ever opportune? And they have an uncanny ability to “get under your skin.” It’s not that they intend to irritate or annoy but somehow they do and though our initial reaction may be to fight we usually take flight, if not physical at least mental.
I think it’s also fair to say that we come into contact with ‘prophets’ too; people who like pests may appear at the most inopportune time. However, prophets are not easily dismissed. They challenge our thinking, force us to re-examine our attitudes and they occasion changes in our modus operandi — our set way of doing things.
Unfortunately all too often prophets are not understood until long after they are dead. This is as true of contemporary prophets as it was of the ancient prophets of Israel many of whom were martyred for their acerbic and sometime sarcastic discourse.
The Scriptures this weekend are about prophets and prophecy both in our personal and in our communal lives.
Is there a prophet in your life?
It’s important to know the difference between the pest and the prophet. Not every pest is a prophet of course, but every prophet may be a little pesty at times.
The first prophet to address us this morning was Ezekiel, a rather eccentric man whom you or I would probably not befriend without insisting that he first enroll in a Dale Carnegie course.
The passage is taken from what is known as his “call narrative,” i.e., the description of his prophetic call by God. Prophets are appointed by God to speak for God, using their own words, of course. Pests are self-appointed. They speak for themselves and for their own vested interests. Unpacking this passage may help us to recognize the qualities and characteristics of a true prophet so that we may be able to distinguish the gallant voice of the prophet from the narcissistic overtures of the pest.
“The Spirit got into me,” he said, “and got me going.” In other words, Ezekiel didn’t assume the role of prophet on his own. God entered his heart, appointed and empowered him to confront the rebellious Israelites in exile.
The title given to him was “Son of Man” or “mortal one” which title reminded him and us of the distance between the greatness of God and Ezekiel’s humanity. Nevertheless, despite his human inadequacies and limitations, God called him and used him as his spokesperson.
And what did God inspire Ezekiel to say to the rebellious Israelites? “Turn or burn!” I’ll bet there were more than a few who would like to have tarred and feathered him right then and there and cast him off the side of a cliff.
However, after the return of the exiles to their homeland, Ezekiel’s words softened to “Turn and learn from your mistakes.” Get to know the mercies of the Lord who wills not the death of the rebellious but that they be converted and live. In many ways he became a thorn in their side but those who took his words to heart despite his eccentricities were truly liberated in mind and heart as well as in the body. To live in the rhythm of God is to be truly free.
Like Ezekiel, Paul, apostle and ‘prophet,’ was somewhat eccentric and even to this day is not the most popular among the early evangelists and missionaries. However, Paul recognized his weakness and was the most insistent and tenacious of all the prophets. He relied on the power of God’s grace to sustain him. He could indeed be pesty but he was not a pest. Prophets are persistent and resilient. Pests are easily dismissed and ignored.
His second letter to the Corinthians is an act of faith, hope, love and of genuine humility the latter being another distinguishing characteristic of the true prophet.
I wonder about that thorn in his side to which he referred in the first sentence. There has been a great deal of speculation ranging from a persistent temptation to arthritis, rheumatism, a nagging headache, loss of hearing or simply a sense of inadequacy in the face of rejection.
We’ll never know for sure but we do know that it didn’t hold him back or prevent him from fulfilling his call and mission. In fact, he was able to put them to advantage in preaching the word. “Therefore, I am content with weakness, insults, hardships, persecutions, and constraints for the sake of Christ; for when I am weak, them I am strong.”
And now we come to the ‘Prophet of prophets,’ Jesus the Christ, the one who was not only empowered by God but who we believe was God incarnate. In his humanity he was as weak as the most human of all the prophets because he willingly divested himself of everything that was divine in order to empower us to live in God. This is the great paradox for believers and a contradiction to non-believers.
However, familiarity got in the way of those who were closest to him to the extent that they could not understand or appreciate his words and deeds. We just don’t expect our children, our parents, grandparents, aunts or uncles to be prophetic. Who do they think they are anyway! In another chapter, Mark says that Jesus’ relatives thought he was out of his mind.
The voices of biblical prophets are still alive in the pages of Scripture but there are other prophets also dead but whose words are still alive in their writings, e.g., Mahatma Ghandi, Thomas Merton, Oscar Romero, Martin Luther King, Mother Theresa, and Jean Vanier, to name only a few. But there are also voices of living prophets local and global such as Bishop Tom Gumbleton, Joan Chitister and authors such as Chris Hedges, Jason Berry and Andrew Greeley, though some of us may think Greeley still needs to work on humility!
There may be a prophet among your neighbors and even in your family. They may not be very verbal words but their actions may speak much louder than words.
Prophets are people sent to help us to be good and to do good, not necessarily to feel good. They get us to think and to think through life’s decisions. They challenge us as individuals and as a community not just for our own best interests but also for the interests of neighbors near and far. They challenge as a nation and as a Church to think not for God but with God. They are true instruments of liberation.
Is there a prophet in your life — down the street, across the globe, or sitting right next to you?
Is it conceivable that you may be a prophet to someone or to an institution in your life — even to the Church?
I hope so!
)