AMERICA Magazine
A balanced Catholic weekly magazine published by the jesuits of the United States for an intelligent Catholic readership. Go online to subscribe.
Liturgy
This link will keep 'parishioners-at-large' in touch with current creative liturgy sources and resources that respect a variety of 'traditions' within the Church.
Voice of the Faithful
A 'movement' of lay Catholics 'inspired' by the abuse scandal calling for greater accountability of bishops to 'Catholics in the Pew.'
Survivos' Network for those Abused by Priests or Religious
A National Network of self-help support groups for people abused by clergy or religious.
Bishop Accountability
Vital information about the disclosure of sexual abuse and related issues affecting Catholics in the pew and the manner in which Bishops continue to exempt themselves from accountability
National Catholic Reporter
A national Catholic lay newspaper covering events not usually covered or presented with a clerical bias in the local diocesan press or but of concern and interest to Catholics.
COMMONWEAL Magazine
A 'lay' Catholic weekly publication with an accent on an intelligent analysis and commentary on curent issues, trends and concerns of interest to Catholics.
+ 5th Week in Ordinary Time
It still has meaning.
1 Kings 8:1-7, 9-13 Psalm 132:6-7, 8-10 Mark 6:53-56
The priests brought the ark of the covenant of the Lord to its place beneath the wings of the cherubim in the sanctuary, the holy of holies of the temple. There was nothing in the ark but the two stone tablets which Moses had put there at Horeb, when the Lord made a covenant with the children of Israel. [1 Kings 8:6, 8]
_
In recent years there has been much discussion in liturgical circles about the proper location of the tabernacle in the worship space. The directives implementing the Constitution on the Liturgy by the Second Vatican Council prescribed that the tabernacle be located in prominent location in the church or chapel, preferably in a chapel dedicated to the reservation of the Blessed Sacrament and appropriate for veneration. In any case, it was not to be located on the altar table used for the celebration of the Eucharist. As a result in many churches renovations, the tabernacle was moved to the ‘side altar’ previously used for the veneration of the Blessed Virgin or St. Joseph and in some churches, it was placed on the old altar previously used for Mass. In situations the old altar was replaced with a permanent pedestal on which the tabernacle was placed.
In liturgical matters, nothing is simple. Those of a more conservative disposition insisted that the location of the Tabernacle on the side altar reduced the status of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist thereby diminishing its meaning in the devotional life of the faithful. Others of a more liberal persuasion opined that in fact, the location in a separate chapel within the church assigned to the sacrament greater prominence thereby increasing the devotional aspect. Moreover, in as much as an emphasis of the ‘action’ of the Mass as the repetition of the “Lord’s Supper” was promoted by the Council, it seemed to liturgists that the location of the tabernacle in the main sanctuary behind the free standing Eucharist table would compete with the ‘action’ of the Mass as a sacred meal.
The most recent prescriptions in the United States provide that the tabernacle be located in the main sanctuary on suitably ornate pedestal. It is ironic that in the major basilicas including the basilica of St. Peter in Rome, the tabernacle is located on a side altar that is not very prominent.
Whatever the location, it should not be a bone of contention worthy of a liturgical battle. The public and private devotion to the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist is rooted in the long tradition of the Church and should not be disparaged. In the same way in which the tablets of stone on which the Ten Commandments was symbolic of God’s presence in the temple, so too, the reservation of the Eucharist Bread has been one of the longest-standing practices of the devotional life of Catholics. It is intended to extend the meaning and the effects of the Eucharistic celebration into the life of the faithful who continue to spend time in prayerful meditation on the mysteries of the life of Jesus not the least of which is his faithfulness unto death on the cross for the salvation of the world. The two aspects of Eucharist need not be in competition. The ‘Mass’ continues to be considered a “sacrificial” meal. But we need to be clear that its connection with the passion and death of Christ even as the lamb of God is not to suggest that his death was mandated to satisfy and angry God. That in my opinion is not an appropriate application of Old Testament sacrifices. No, Jesus sacrificial death was the completion of his entire sacrificial life of unqualified and indiscriminate love in the same way as the sacrificial love of partners in marriage offer their sacrificial love to one another or in the manner that Mother Teresa offered her live in sacrificial service to victims of poverty in the streets of Calctta. It is in this sense that devotion to the Eucharist in the tabernacle takes its extended meaning.
During the celebration of the Eucharist, we become what we eat. Through our devotion to the Eucharist reserved in the tabernacle, we are reminded that the Eucharistic presence in our mind, heart and soul extends into all the good works of our lives with the hope that we too will always think and act with the same sacrificial love as did Jesus in his earthly life.
Daily Scripture Archive»The ‘Art’ of Prophecy
The story is told about an eloquent preacher who was asked by a member of his congregation to recite Psalm 22, also known as “The Shepherd’s Psalm.” The preacher was gifted in oratory and had put to memory many biblical texts that he was able to recite with dramatic flair at will with little or no notice.
But there was in the congregation an elderly ‘pilgrim’ of deep faith and piety, a humble man whose life epitomized the life of the good shepherd. The preacher turned to the one making the request and then pointing to the elderly man in the pew replied, “Invite him. Indeed, I know the shepherd psalm by heart but this man knows the Shepherd.”
Amos was such a man who lived eight centuries before Christ and although he obviously didn’t know him, he knew the Lord well and is considered by biblical scholars, a prototype of Jesus. He was a poor layman of humble stock about whom little is known except that he was a country boy, a shepherd and a migrant worker from a small Judean town named Tekoa not far from the northern board of Israel. He received a call from God to go up to the northern kingdom of Israel during the reign of Jeroboam II to preach reform to people whose wealth and power had corrupted them. You can read a description of the state of affairs in any standard commentary on the text. Although at its peak of power and prosperity, it was in large measure a decadent society socially, politically and spiritually. It would not be an overstatement to suggest that Amos was less than diplomatic and politically correct when he addressed the men as “fat cats” and the women as “fat cows.” I’m not sure whether it was gall or courage that drove him to speak so directly and so boldly but his words were compelling.
Amaziah, the official priest of Jeroboam’s regime was an insider charged with the responsibilities connected with religious protocol and official worship – a sort of ‘Monsignor’ I suppose. He was a politically correct professional religious cleric and he served at the pleasure of the king. Amos threatened not only the religious but also the political and social status quo. In fact it was his God-fearing moral tone that permeated his criticism of the decline in the social and political mores of Israel and alienated him from the entire population except perhaps for the poorest members who were the primary victims of the corrupt society. In his mind there was no such thing as political and social life distinct from the laws of justice or devoid of religious meaning and of course, he was correct.
Amaziah wanted Amos expelled, deported back to where he belonged. Amos remained steadfast and would not be deterred from what he truly believed was God’s call. In a terse reply to Amaziah, he reiterated in simple language that because God sent him, he had no choice but to acquiesce to God’s call. That’s it in a nutshell whether or not the king liked it.
Saint Paul’s letter to the Ephesians was composed as a prayer of praise and blessing to accompany the celebration of Christian baptism that is the initial call to enter the full life of Christ as a member of his body. Paul, also a layman, was very conscious of this call and took very seriously, his partnership with God in Christ. He was a missionary and a prophet. Like Amos, his words were more compelling than entertaining. Last week we heard his confession of humanity that he insisted did not stand in the way of his call because he was empowered by Christ to speak for Christ. It took a long time for Paul to recognize his call but once he was convinced of its genuiness, he could not be deterred from preaching Christ crucified and risen from the death until his own death but he fulfilled his call with true humility and joy knowing that his strength came from God.
Though Son of God, Jesus was an itinerant lay preacher whose mission and ministry was uncomplicated. Unlike Amos or even Paul, he was what we might call a ‘gentle reformer’ not in the sense that he was soft or wimpy but like that described in the prophecy of Isaiah, “a bruised reed he would not break nor flickering flame will he snuff out.” His used parables and stories that contained lessons from nature and ordinary human experiences. He was meek and innocent but he was not naïve. He knew how the human mind and heart could be deceived but he never gave up on humanity even to the extent that he absorbed the effects of sin individual and communal, personal and institutional.
So the description of his commission to the disciples should not surprise us and it is from this commission that we are invited to take our own cue.
Though not completely aware of the implications of our call at Baptism, we grew to understand that call with the help of all the priests, preachers and prophets in our lives, most of whom are lay persons—parents, teachers and mentors and a host of people who challenge us to be our best selves without hassling us. Challenges stretch us and help us to grow; hassles stifle growth and limit access to truth.
So who are the prophets that have kept us honest in our pursuit of holiness, who got us to think through the issues of the day that we respond and act with integrity?
Sometimes prophets come from within the ranks of church leadership. Where would we be as Church were it not for Pope John XXIII when he convened the Second Vatican Council? He was a prophet whose time had come to challenge the Church not to condemn the world, but to engage the world in a dialogue that would allow us to discover new truths that would free us from the things that oppress humanity and prevent us from becoming all that God has destined us to be.
Prior to Vatican II, popes tended to oppose the world, issuing condemnatory statements against what they perceived to be a threat to the very existence of the Church, arbitrarily naming scientific theories and social-political movements as anti-Catholic “modernism” and even as it pertains to the American principle of the separation of church and state.
Vatican II was not just about liturgical changes but about a change in the mind and heart of the Church itself transforming it from an institution at odds with the world to a movement that acknowledged human progress while at the same time remaining faithful to the basic truths of Christianity. Pope John sought to ‘engage’ the world in a dialogue that would lead to a new truth that would enable all humanity to progress toward its destiny intended by God. This was also the underlying principle of ecumenism and dialogue with other religious traditions and even those of no specific religious tradition.
Pope John XXIII cautioned us to be aware of false prophets whom he referred to as “prophets of doom” who insisted on the rigid status quo, virtually isolating the Church from the world. These prophets of doom are still around and can be found among church leadership of every rank, clerical and non-clerical. They live in fear of truth and they deny the reality of the living Christ living within the Church in various cultures throughout the world and even in the hearts of those who do not know Christ.
That stated, it is still true that the Church has been prophetic in its teachings about the seamless garment of life and about the evil of war and poverty rooted in injustice. And yet, this does not preclude an honest and intelligent and authentic dialogue with those who view the nuances of right-to-life cases and causes as not as clean and clear as we.
We do not check our intelligence at the door of the church when we enter.
Where would the Church be without St. Joan of Arc and Catherine of Siena and a host of other individuals from the faithful at large who have challenged the Church to be true to its mission throughout the centuries? Joan of Arc was condemned by the Church and burned at the stake. Catherine was responsible for the return of the papacy from its estranged and confused locations in Avignon to Rome.
Thomas Merton is a marvelous example of the prophet whose prophecy was rooted in the contemplative life behind the cloister but whose words still impact on the lives of people in the streets around the globe, many of them Catholic, many of them of other religious traditions and of no specific religious tradition.
There are prophets among theologians and human rights activists to whom we must be attentive.
Some prophets come from ‘outside the walls’ as it were. Where would the Church be without the prophecy of Martin Luther King? The Church was as guilty of racism as the nation at large. Human rights activists have a prophetic role in the world and in the Church.
Women have a particular prophetic role in the world and in the Church today. The issues that face women in the world and in the Church are not going away and they will not be dismissed easily by the men in black or purple or white.
Even priests can be prophets. I recall on one occasion many years ago, I was waxing eloquent about an issue I felt impelled to explore prphetically with the congregation at Christmas. Two women left in the middle of my homily. I thought to myself, “uh oh, I have ruffled their feathers. I’m in trouble.” I caught up with them after Mass to inquire if my prophetic remarks had been too strong? They responded, “Oh, no. Neither one of us knew what you were talking about. It was just getting too hot in there!” I’m not sure whether they were referring to the heat in the church or what they considered ‘hot air’ from the pulpit!
I suppose in some sense, they had become a bit prophetic to me as their pastor, i.e., “Keep the message, prophetic or otherwise, clear and simple!” Thank you!
Is there a prophet in your life? I hope so. Is it possible that you may be a prophet to someone or to the Church itself?
)