• Editorial - Op Ed
• Bulletin Board, Announcements, Calendar
• Welcome and Website Protocol
• Article Archive

Print this page

Article Categories

• Book Reviews
• Open Letter
• Editorials
• Notes, Quotes & Comments
• Pastor's Study
• Project Millstones
• Sidebar Comments
• Weekly Message

Links

AMERICA Magazine
A balanced Catholic weekly magazine published by the jesuits of the United States for an intelligent Catholic readership. Go online to subscribe.

Liturgy
This link will keep 'parishioners-at-large' in touch with current creative liturgy sources and resources that respect a variety of 'traditions' within the Church.

Voice of the Faithful
A 'movement' of lay Catholics 'inspired' by the abuse scandal calling for greater accountability of bishops to 'Catholics in the Pew.'

Survivos' Network for those Abused by Priests or Religious
A National Network of self-help support groups for people abused by clergy or religious.

Bishop Accountability
Vital information about the disclosure of sexual abuse and related issues affecting Catholics in the pew and the manner in which Bishops continue to exempt themselves from accountability

National Catholic Reporter
A national Catholic lay newspaper covering events not usually covered or presented with a clerical bias in the local diocesan press or but of concern and interest to Catholics.

COMMONWEAL Magazine
A 'lay' Catholic weekly publication with an accent on an intelligent analysis and commentary on curent issues, trends and concerns of interest to Catholics.

Search

Daily Scripture

+ 5th Week in Ordinary Time

It still has meaning.

1 Kings 8:1-7, 9-13 Psalm 132:6-7, 8-10 Mark 6:53-56

The priests brought the ark of the covenant of the Lord to its place beneath the wings of the cherubim in the sanctuary, the holy of holies of the temple. There was nothing in the ark but the two stone tablets which Moses had put there at Horeb, when the Lord made a covenant with the children of Israel. [1 Kings 8:6, 8]
_
In recent years there has been much discussion in liturgical circles about the proper location of the tabernacle in the worship space. The directives implementing the Constitution on the Liturgy by the Second Vatican Council prescribed that the tabernacle be located in prominent location in the church or chapel, preferably in a chapel dedicated to the reservation of the Blessed Sacrament and appropriate for veneration. In any case, it was not to be located on the altar table used for the celebration of the Eucharist. As a result in many churches renovations, the tabernacle was moved to the ‘side altar’ previously used for the veneration of the Blessed Virgin or St. Joseph and in some churches, it was placed on the old altar previously used for Mass. In situations the old altar was replaced with a permanent pedestal on which the tabernacle was placed.

In liturgical matters, nothing is simple. Those of a more conservative disposition insisted that the location of the Tabernacle on the side altar reduced the status of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist thereby diminishing its meaning in the devotional life of the faithful. Others of a more liberal persuasion opined that in fact, the location in a separate chapel within the church assigned to the sacrament greater prominence thereby increasing the devotional aspect. Moreover, in as much as an emphasis of the ‘action’ of the Mass as the repetition of the “Lord’s Supper” was promoted by the Council, it seemed to liturgists that the location of the tabernacle in the main sanctuary behind the free standing Eucharist table would compete with the ‘action’ of the Mass as a sacred meal.

The most recent prescriptions in the United States provide that the tabernacle be located in the main sanctuary on suitably ornate pedestal. It is ironic that in the major basilicas including the basilica of St. Peter in Rome, the tabernacle is located on a side altar that is not very prominent.

Whatever the location, it should not be a bone of contention worthy of a liturgical battle. The public and private devotion to the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist is rooted in the long tradition of the Church and should not be disparaged. In the same way in which the tablets of stone on which the Ten Commandments was symbolic of God’s presence in the temple, so too, the reservation of the Eucharist Bread has been one of the longest-standing practices of the devotional life of Catholics. It is intended to extend the meaning and the effects of the Eucharistic celebration into the life of the faithful who continue to spend time in prayerful meditation on the mysteries of the life of Jesus not the least of which is his faithfulness unto death on the cross for the salvation of the world. The two aspects of Eucharist need not be in competition. The ‘Mass’ continues to be considered a “sacrificial” meal. But we need to be clear that its connection with the passion and death of Christ even as the lamb of God is not to suggest that his death was mandated to satisfy and angry God. That in my opinion is not an appropriate application of Old Testament sacrifices. No, Jesus sacrificial death was the completion of his entire sacrificial life of unqualified and indiscriminate love in the same way as the sacrificial love of partners in marriage offer their sacrificial love to one another or in the manner that Mother Teresa offered her live in sacrificial service to victims of poverty in the streets of Calctta. It is in this sense that devotion to the Eucharist in the tabernacle takes its extended meaning.

During the celebration of the Eucharist, we become what we eat. Through our devotion to the Eucharist reserved in the tabernacle, we are reminded that the Eucharistic presence in our mind, heart and soul extends into all the good works of our lives with the hope that we too will always think and act with the same sacrificial love as did Jesus in his earthly life.

Twenty-Third Sunday in Ordinary Time 'B'

Sunday September 6, 2009

Don’t shout! I can hear you.

Unless we have borne a handicap from birth or early childhood, we tend not to appreciate the stigma that is too often associated with a physical or emotional handicap, particularly as children. It is not unusual for handicapped children to be ‘tagged’ by their peers becoming targets for puns and objects of humor for amateur comedians.

Even adults with handicaps are not spared offensive jokes and jests. But lest we go to excess in the other extreme, handicapped persons are not without a sense of humor. I suppose there is a fine line between gentle banter and demeaning jokes.

This story was told by a man who himself had labored with a hearing impediment and other chronic ailments. Despite his handicaps, he has never lost his sense of humor or the ability to laugh at himself.

Having suffered a major hearing loss, he was persuaded by his loving family to purchase a rather expensive hearing aid so that they could refrain from shouting at him. So frustrated had they become with his repeated requests to speak louder, they pledged to pay for a new hearing device no matter the cost.

Off he went and on his return was pleased to announce that they would pay through the nose for his new aid. As he entered the room, he announced, “This will set you all back $10,000!” To which they responded, “Yipes, what kind is it?” He replied, “It’s three o’clock!”

Speaking of which, I have reached the stage at which I am unable to distinguish words or decipher sounds when I’m in a large crowd. Until a few years ago, I had assumed that hearing loss has to do with volume, but this is not always the case except at wedding receptions. Speaking of which, I attended a particular reception last year and at one point, I went out to the bar and asked the bartender for either another scotch or a set of ear plugs to which he quickly responded, “I have both!”

Jesus was particularly sensitive not only to the blind and the deaf but to the weak and vulnerable of every class and category. He was careful never to attach a stigma to a physical or mental handicap connecting it with wrongdoing as was common among his peers.

How many parents who have given birth to a child with severe disabilities have carried the burden of guilt and suffered the consequences of a sin they didn’t commit. This is not God’s way!

In more recent times some parents of sons or daughters who turn out to be of a homosexual orientation have also been known to suffer guilt or estrangement as if somehow they were responsible for the orientation of their children. In their guilt they attempt the impossible and end up alienating their own flesh and blood from home and hearth. This is not God’s way!

The scriptures this weekend deal with handicaps of one kind or another but the biblical authors use them as a metaphor for a hearing disability among his disciples that many of us seem to have inherited. In this sense are we not all handicapped children of God?

Our handicap may or may not be physical though, to be sure, sooner or later if we live long enough, we will be afflicted by one kind or another, you can bet on that! After my dad died, I found a magnifying glass in every room! At 92 he experienced the early stages of macula degeneration. I can expect the same when I reach 92 if not before, so I’ve saved all the magnifying glasses. I have one in my pocket as I speak!

But most of our handicaps are spiritual. Carl Jung said that many of the psychological mishaps that derail us in the course of life are often rooted in a lack of insight and spiritual blindness. Healing starts when we acknowledge our handicaps and cry out for help.

The Scriptures do not provide simple answers or magic solutions to our handicaps—not at all. On the contrary, they challenge us to find answers and work toward solutions that bear out the fact that God intervenes through human minds and hearts and hands. Isn’t this what the incarnation was all about? Was Jesus himself spared from the search? Was he spared the stress and strains of being clothed in human skin?

As we continue to grapple with the serious issues of the day, not least of which is universal health care and unemployment it is important that we listen before we speak and do the homework necessary to form an opinion. Moreover, it is essential to remain civil in our dialogue and not bite anyone’s finger off no matter how much we disagree. I suppose it’s also true that we should avoid pointing our finger at anyone and risk losing it!

I have found the Dali Lama’s “Instructions for Life” worthy of some consideration during these challenging times. I think his wisdom is the perfect corollary to today’s lessons:

1. Take into account that great love and great achievements involve great risk.

2. When you lose, don’t lose the lesson.

3. Follow the three R’s:
• Respect for self,
• Respect for others and
• Responsibility for all your actions.

4. Remember that not getting what you want is sometimes a wonderful stroke of luck. (And I would add, a blessing.)

5. Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.

6. Don’t let a little dispute injure a great relationship.

7. When you realize you’ve made a mistake, take immediate steps to correct it.

8. Spend some time alone every day.

9. Open your arms to change, but don’t let go of your values.

10. Remember that silence is sometimes the best answer.

11. Live a good, honorable life. Then when you get older and think back, you’ll be able to enjoy it a second time.

12. A loving atmosphere in your home [and heart] is the foundation for your life.

Now go and live it to the best of your ability with God’s grace.