• Editorial - Op Ed
• Bulletin Board, Announcements, Calendar
• Welcome and Website Protocol
• Article Archive

Print this page

Article Categories

• Book Reviews
• Open Letter
• Editorials
• Notes, Quotes & Comments
• Pastor's Study
• Project Millstones
• Sidebar Comments
• Weekly Message

Links

AMERICA Magazine
A balanced Catholic weekly magazine published by the jesuits of the United States for an intelligent Catholic readership. Go online to subscribe.

Liturgy
This link will keep 'parishioners-at-large' in touch with current creative liturgy sources and resources that respect a variety of 'traditions' within the Church.

Voice of the Faithful
A 'movement' of lay Catholics 'inspired' by the abuse scandal calling for greater accountability of bishops to 'Catholics in the Pew.'

Survivos' Network for those Abused by Priests or Religious
A National Network of self-help support groups for people abused by clergy or religious.

Bishop Accountability
Vital information about the disclosure of sexual abuse and related issues affecting Catholics in the pew and the manner in which Bishops continue to exempt themselves from accountability

National Catholic Reporter
A national Catholic lay newspaper covering events not usually covered or presented with a clerical bias in the local diocesan press or but of concern and interest to Catholics.

COMMONWEAL Magazine
A 'lay' Catholic weekly publication with an accent on an intelligent analysis and commentary on curent issues, trends and concerns of interest to Catholics.

Search

Daily Scripture

+ 4th Week in Ordinary Time

Everyone needs a bit of ‘pocket time’

Readings: 1 Kings 3:4-13 Psalm 119:9-14 Mark 6:30-34

The apostles rejoined Jesus and told him all they had done and taught. Then he said to them, “You must come away to some lonely place all by ourselves and rest for a while.” [Mark 6:30]

The notion of Sabbath rest is rooted in the third of the Ten Commandments, “Keep holy the Lord’s day.” For Christians, Sunday is our Sabbath because it was the day on which the Lord rose from the dead. Holiness is the state of being whole, i.e., fully integrated, mind, soul and body. It is the acknowledgment of God as the ground of our being.

In truth, God doesn’t need the Sabbath; we do!

However, I am of the mind that we need to build into our daily routine, a mini-Sabbath or two. I call it ‘pocket time’ or time out from the pressure of our daily schedule. Some folks call it down time.

Of course, there are different strokes for different folks. A good power walk also can be a great opportunity for conversation with God. It’s an easy script. God talks and I listen.

All of us, married or single and whatever our call and career need pocket time every day and in that way we learn to live in the present moment. As my cousin frequently reminds me, “Yesterday is a cancelled check; tomorrow may never come; the present is a gift.” How true. I’m still a neophyte.

Guest Opinion worthy of Note

Monday November 7, 2011

I thought this ‘reprint’ from the National Catholic Reporter was worthy of your attention. Among the man ‘erudite’ commentaries on…Read full entry

Editorial - Op Ed

Monday September 20, 2010

It won’t go away until it’s fixed ... and it’s more than a matter of conversion. There is a…Read full entry

Editorial - Op Ed

Saturday September 4, 2010

As i watch the media coverage of the proposed construction of the mosque two blocks from the site of the…Read full entry

Guest Editorial

Saturday June 5, 2010

A Pattern of Missteps, an editorial from COMMONWEAL Magazine. June 4, 2010 Apart from such political blunders, recent pastoral failures within the…Read full entry

Editorial - Op Ed

Sunday September 6, 2009

Prophecy has its privileges but it also has its risks! Most of those who know me, also know that I am…Read full entry

Editorial - Op Ed

Friday August 28, 2009

Bishop decries ‘combative tactics’ of a minority of U.S. bishops Published on National Catholic Reporter (http://ncronline.org) Albuquerque, NM A majority of U.S. bishops…Read full entry

The Grace of Good Friday

Thursday March 20, 2008

Jesus is dead! Banks are closed. No mail delivery today. Off to Nassau and the islands for a break? or instead to Disneyworld? Color Easter…Read full entry

Open Letter to US Bishops

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Last Sunday in observance of the fifth anniversary of the meeting of the US bishops in Dallas to hear the…Read full entry

Editorial - Op Ed

Saturday June 2, 2007

I have been thinking about drafting an ‘editorial / op-ed’ piece entitled, ‘The Catholic Wink.’ It’s a glib term…Read full entry

Editorial - Op Ed

Sunday March 18, 2007

It’s a matter of conscience For several weeks in succession, I repeated the ‘pulpit’ announcement at the conclusion of Mass at…Read full entry

Tomorrow's Priests - a 'guest' editorial

Friday January 12, 2007

November 3, 2006 / Volume CXXXIII, Number 19 EDITORIAL – COMMONWEAL Magazine The Catholic priesthood in…Read full entry

Unanswered Question Linger...

Monday January 8, 2007

Boston Globe on the Fifth Anniversary of Disclosure By Steven Krueger | January 7, 2007 It couldn’t be stated more…Read full entry

Guest Opinion worthy of Note

Monday November 7, 2011

I thought this ‘reprint’ from the National Catholic Reporter was worthy of your attention. Among the man ‘erudite’ commentaries on the new translations, I found this rather unique. The author is a young Latin scholar and a faithful contemporary practicing Catholic. I hope he is an example of young people who are contributing to our future as a Church that is in touch with changing times. Personally, Although I am disappointed in the new translation for several reasons, I don’t consider it worthy a demonstration or nation-wide protest. I do admit that good worship is dignified and reverent. Liturgy is not meant to be a pageant or be the occasion for theatrics. If the presider is well prepared and the liturgical ministers exercise their role with care, the rhythm of the liturgy will effect what it signifies and will touch the soul.

Father Lasch

By Robert McClory
Created Nov 02, 2011
•by Robert McClory [1] on Nov. 02, 2011 NCR Today [2]
Erik Baker is a 16-year-old high school student who has been studying Latin since 6th grade. Now as a senior at Evanston Township High School near Chicago, he has completed all the Latin classes available at his school, including the Advanced Placement courses. He is pursuing his ongoing interest through Latin classes at nearby Northwestern University.

Erik has been raised as a Catholic and attends Mass with his family at the Sheil Catholic Center at Northwestern. Recently, when materials were distributed explaining the new liturgical changes based on the original Latin text, he studied them with special interest.

“When I looked at the new version, I had a sort of knee-jerk reaction,” Erik said. “What I saw didn’t sit well with me. Yeah, the changes are more literal and faithful to the Latin, but is that desirable? Much of the phrasing and the changes seemed kind of ridiculous.”

So he did an analysis and wrote a brief essay, not for class, but just to get his reaction down on paper and out of his system. He said he hadn’t read any reviews of the translation before he produced his version. A friend of the family suggested NCR readers might be interested in Erik’s critique.

On the revised Roman missal
By Erik Baker

It’s definitely a better translation. That’s probably the biggest misconception that critics of the recent revision of the General Roman Missal have. They perceive the new translation as some sort of conservative formalization of the text that is only ostensibly more faithful to the Latin. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. Though there are some changes that really are no better, and certainly tend towards archaic jargon, the vast majority of the dramatic shifts—especially to the Confiteor, the Gloria, and the Nicene Creed—are certainly far more accurate.

In fact, looking over the Latin, it’s quite clear that the former translation didn’t even attempt to be literal. So the question clearly isn’t “is it a better translation,” if “better” is defined in terms of accuracy vis-a-vis the Latin. The question is “is a more accurate translation desirable?” For many that question will seem like a no-brainer. Of course we want to stay as close to the Latin as possible. And yet, I think it’s valuable to use these changes as an opportunity to examine the value of the Latin Mass and ultimately the nature of the Mass itself. I think that the conclusions might be startling.

Let’s start at the beginning. The first major change is to the Confiteor, the prayer used in most forms of the Penitential Rite. The new translation translates the adverb “nimis” as “greatly”, so that it now reads “I have greatly sinned.” It’s certainly a dramatic change, but one that’s grounded in the Latin. In fact, the word “nimis” means something more than “greatly”; it actually connotes the idea of “excessiveness”. The other change is that the Latin “mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa” is now translated “through my fault, through my fault, through my most grievous fault.” This is pretty much a literal translation. So the Latin is solid.
The problem, though, is that the Latin itself seems to be hyperbolically critical of humanity. It might aim to promote humility, but inevitably it fosters guilt instead. It promotes a vision of human nature as overwhelmingly and inexorably sinful—a vision more in line with the heretical Janesenist doctrine of centuries past than Catholic dogma.

An apologist of the translation reminds us that “the guiding principle of the new translation is a closer adherence to the Latin—not a sharper critique of our virtue.” But this makes absolutely no sense. Who cares what the “guiding principle” was? The end result is that the Latin is more condemnatory for no discernible reason. And there is no scriptural grounding for this “sharper critique” either—the first appearance of the prayer is in 1100 AD, over a millennium after Christ.

The next major change is to the Gloria. Most of the changes are innocuous enough, but there’s one at the beginning of the prayer that seems bizarre to me. The familiar “and peace to his people on earth” is changed to “on earth peace to people of good will.” Not only is the latter far more awkward in English, but there’s also a problematic sentiment implicit in the new phrase. Why are we only praying that people “of good will” receive peace? This seems to say that people who are without “good will” are not deserving of peace.

But what is “good will”? It seems to me that it could either mean “good” in the virtuous sense of the word, or, more specifically, Catholic. In either case, it expresses a profoundly anti-Christian sentiment. The notion that only moral or Christian people deserve peace and our prayers is anathema to everything Jesus ever taught. There is simply no sound reason for abandoning “love your enemies” simply because it’s closer to the Latin. The original Greektext recognizes this, and expresses “goodwill to all people.” Ironically, the Latin is then actually a mistranslation of the Greek. This just highlights the fact that the possibility of human error doesn’t disappear when writing church texts. It’s hard to see what inherent reason we have for respecting this highly fallible process.
Finally, I think the changes to the Nicene Creed merit some discussion. As before, all of them have good grounding in the Latin, but it’s the Latin that’s problematic. The first is the fact that all of the “believe”s are in the first person. This destroys the sense of communal vision found in the “we believe” of the previous translation. Faith becomes something of the individual, by the individual, for the individual—ironically, a very Protestant idea. Catholicism is supposed to value unity and togetherness.
Furthermore, there are two bizarre translations of particular words in the Latin that sound awkward and even obscure: “consubstantial” and “was incarnate.” The former is a translation of the word “consubstantialem” in the Latin, so it certainly resembles the Latin the most. But does that make it a better translation?
Surely not. The first rule that every Latin translator learns is that often Latin words may look like certain long, rare English words—but comprehensibility matters more. The same applies to “was incarnate.” The whole reason why an English translation is used in the first place is so people can actually understand the Mass. For the average churchgoer “consubstantial” is no more comprehensible than “consubstantialem.” Ridiculous words defeat the point of a translation in the first place.

Ultimately, the whole affair just begs the question of why the Latin Mass has any particular spiritual significance. It’s certainly not Scripture, and it’s often just an amalgamation of various communal prayers used throughout Europe for several centuries. In fact, many early bishops would write their own Masses or translations to best fit their community’s needs. And that’s the essence of Mass. The reason why we come to Mass in the first place rather than just praying by ourselves is the interaction with others that has spiritual importance. In the Mass the people become the Body of Christ, conceived as the organic whole Paul writes about in the famous passage from 1 Corinthians: “for the body is not one member, but many.”

The problem with the new translation and indeed the notion of a codified Latin Mass at all is that it destroys the communal and egalitarian nature of the act. Rather than an act of communion through which the churchgoer relates to God, it becomes an individualistic act through which the churchgoer relates to “experts” in Rome. It sets certain people above others in terms of their knowledge of a dead language and of dogma - concerns that clearly distract from the message of God. If the Mass has any meaning, it must be grounded in communal concerns and vision- not an effort to include as many four-syllable words as possible.

•NCR Today
Copyright © The National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company
115 E. Armour Blvd., Kansas City, MO 64111
(TEL 1-816-531-0538 FAX 1-816-968-2268)
Send comments about this Web site to: webkeeper@ncronline.org PRIVACY POLICY ADVERTISING POLICY